Skip to content

Lauryn Hill a Habitual Liar? Rohan Marley Denies Connection to ‘Baby Bump’

Lauryn Hill recently announced the forthcoming of baby No. 6 at her concert in Detroit over this past weekend, however the cat is let out of the bag via ‘her baby’s father,’ Rohan Marley who heads over to his twitter  account and insists, without an “l-o-l or smiley face” that he has no association with Ms. Hill’s big baby-bump announcement. Say What?!!  In response to Hip Hop Wired via twitter, Marley states: “2 things I’m not married and I don’t have anyone expecting anything…” He also states that “Until he says out of his mouth the contrary,” he is not the father—he is no longer married to his ex- wife nor Lauren Hill and no she is not currently pregnant with his child. So basically that new baby bump she is sporting around is a result of “someone else’s seed.”

In finalizing his statement Marley proclaims, “Trust me, the info out there is so incorrect for so many years…thanks for twitter I check a few things.” And there we have it folks, another case of “I aint yo baby’s daddy”…I wonder what other things he’s talking about are not the truth and what does he mean “until he says out of his mouth the contrary?” All that means to me is that he indeed could be the father. Anyway this is sad times for Lauryn Hill because now she looks like a pure-bred habitual liar. Marley’s statement could very well be the missing link that lends truth to the fact that Hill is desperate for love and well, I hate to say it, but a bit deranged. In less than 24 hours great news has turned to a big pile of mess! Not to mention, this is making “us” look real bad; I’m talking Michael Jackson ‘Bad.’ I guess all I can say now is stay tuned as this story unfolds. *sigh*


  1. BLAST MAN on June 8, 2011 at 4:00 pm

    This article is messy, inappropriate and negligent in reporting facts. Mr. Marley’s comments do not and should not imply that Ms. Hill is a “habitual liar”. Per the comments and news reports that I have read, she never said who the father of her unborn child is. She simply either said or implied that she was pregnant. I think most fans and others in the media assumed that it would be Mr. Marley’s child since she (and her children) have been linked with him. He may or may not be the father of this child, yet whatever is the case is really no ones business nor is Ms. Hill obligated to state who is the father. The only thing that can be assumed based upon what has been reported is that Mr. Marley is not claiming biological link to this child. Thats all. This article went beyond objective boundaries and became subjective by projecting and insuiating a negative depiction of Ms. Hill for the sake of salicious intent. Thus, this so called journalist is the only thing that is BAD!!

    • Sharde Monet on June 8, 2011 at 2:27 pm

      Thas right!!…I’m Michael Jackson Bad *does the moon walk* lol …and did you even read the article or did you just read the title? This article shuts down all the assumptions and simply sets the record straight that Marley is not the father of her child point blank period …. Dont be mad at me because he’s not the daddy lol

    • MzMocha2003 on June 8, 2011 at 7:02 pm

      The article isn’t messy, however Rohan Marley is!!! Why in the world did he feel the need to say that wasnt his child on a social network?!?! Thats messy….Miss Hill didnt mention who the father was she just stated that she was with child! Lauryn is messy too (im still a fan though) she has 6 kids and has never been married, this article is just stating facts!!! #itiswhatitis

      • Ken on June 23, 2011 at 10:20 pm

        Calling Ms. Hill “deranged, a purebred habitual liar and desperate for love” is not stating the facts….It’s the author’s personal opinion.

  2. Robinsoncourtney on July 8, 2011 at 12:12 pm

    Is Rolling Out supposed to be a gossip site or a news blog? It seems like more of the former with this article. She never said it was Rohans, so what is she lying about. Not to mention, I find it strange that nothing he said set off any red flags for the writer. Nothing seemed suspect in the least? Really? Yet you guys seem super insistent on painting Hill as a poor excuse for a human being whether it’s making her out to be crazy, dishonest, broken and damaged goods. Well you won’t be the first. I guess youre trying to be provocative, but really this article falls flat.