The justices of the Louisiana Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Rodricus Crawford’s appeal of the death sentence he was given in Caddo Parish, Louisiana, the nation’s death penalty capital. Below are a collection of live tweets that suggest the justices have concerns regarding this case, as well.
Read more articles from this series:
Why does this town keep putting innocent black men on death row? (video)
Rodricus Crawford’s timeline to die
Black D.A. James Stewart opposes White defender
White defender mounts appeal, opposes black D.A.
Being an ‘unemployed pothead’ doesn’t make him a murderer
State of Louisiana vs. Rodricus Crawford has received national media attention in large part because the evidence presented did not support the state’s claim: that Crawford, without motive, smothered his 1-year-old son with his hand, went back to bed, and woke screaming the next morning that the baby was dead.
LaSC justices seem perplexed by state case.
Kroll: How did this get to be indicted as a 1st degree murder case? pic.twitter.com/ncnjBQj77F— Yolanda Young (@yolandayoungesq) September 7, 2016
LaSC justices have QUESTIONS:
It's clear baby had pneumonia so what does evidence to the contrary have to do w/ it? pic.twitter.com/ebGX2DWtdi— Yolanda Young (@yolandayoungesq) September 7, 2016
LaSC justices have QUESTIONS:
Are you saying there was no history of respiratory problems? (There was history) pic.twitter.com/u2k3FbMlpu— Yolanda Young (@yolandayoungesq) September 7, 2016
LaSC justices have QUESTIONS:
I might disagree w [state] expert. When my gkids can't breathe, it scares me to death! pic.twitter.com/MydIgEbZ5A— Yolanda Young (@yolandayoungesq) September 7, 2016
LaSC justices have QUESTIONS:
Are you suggesting this man smothered his baby w hand and got back in bed w dead baby? pic.twitter.com/21JUer4aA2— Yolanda Young (@yolandayoungesq) September 7, 2016
LaSC justices are crushing assist DA Tommy Johnson:
Wasn't there a motive presented that was PROFOUNDLY disproved? pic.twitter.com/5VkClN8hM5— Yolanda Young (@yolandayoungesq) September 7, 2016
Is LaSC Justice Kroll is incredulous? "This was a sick child, sir!" to assist DA. pic.twitter.com/JcQiiJeAhp
— Yolanda Young (@yolandayoungesq) September 7, 2016
Other problems with the case include a dispute over the state’s pathology report, which nine experts have discredited. Most troubling was the prosecutor’s suggestion to the jury that Jesus Christ required them to give Crawford the death penalty.
LaSC Justice Kroll to the assistant DA. "That doesn't prove murder!" (Boom) pic.twitter.com/zDyZ5ndC5y
— Yolanda Young (@yolandayoungesq) September 7, 2016
LaSC justices have QUESTIONS:
Kroll: So there is more evidence in record [supporting innocence] than guilt? pic.twitter.com/58tDiXJL9z— Yolanda Young (@yolandayoungesq) September 7, 2016
Kroll: Mr. Johnson, do you believe this case supports 1st degree murder and death penalty?…It's so circumstantial. pic.twitter.com/IOgoS5Xjs1
— Yolanda Young (@yolandayoungesq) September 7, 2016
This has not been a good day for the state…
Justice Johnson to Assist DA Tommy Johnson: "You should know this." pic.twitter.com/q09kEzTtow— Yolanda Young (@yolandayoungesq) September 7, 2016
Justices: We are trying to see if err in way you resolved the prima facie race challenge. (Assist DA stutters.) pic.twitter.com/PuBHPBO0HO
— Yolanda Young (@yolandayoungesq) September 7, 2016
Assuming they are students, Justice Johnson asks group of spectators who they are. They are John Crawford's family. pic.twitter.com/PXbivK01XB
— Yolanda Young (@yolandayoungesq) September 7, 2016